Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00887
Original file (BC 2014 00887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00887

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His date of enlistment be changed from 30 Jan 43 to Dec 41.

His records be corrected to reflect the award of the 
Presidential Unit Citation.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His records only reflect one year of service; however, to become 
a pilot he had to train for at least a year and then he served 
in combat for a year.  His records show service for only one 
year, between 1944 and 1945.

He has a photo of a General pinning a Medal on his chest.  He 
was told it was the Presidential Unit Citation.  This is not 
reflected in his records.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 30 Jan 
43.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibit C 
and D.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The applicant’s military records were 
nearly destroyed in the fire at the National Personnel Record 
Center (NPRC) on 12 Jul 73.  With the severe constraints on 
documentation, it is impossible to verify any service beyond 
what is shown on the attached statement of service.

The applicant served in the Air Force Enlisted Reserve from 
17 Jul 42 to 30 Jan 43.  He became an Aviation Cadet on 30 Jan 
43 and was discharged on 7 Feb 44 to be commissioned on 8 Feb 
44.  There is no documentation in his record to reflect any 
military service prior to 17 Jul 42.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPSID recommends no action is required relating to the 
award of the Presidential Unit Citation.  After a thorough 
review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, 
they were able to verify the award of the Presidential Unit 
Citation.  It is listed on his Report of Separation (WD AGO Form 
53-98) as “Distinguished Unit Badge”. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 19 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility (OPR) and adopt their rationale as the basis for 
our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
of injustice.  The Board took note that AFPC/DPSIDR was able to 
verify the award of the Presidential Unit Citation and is listed 
on his Report of Separation (WD AGO Form 53-98) as 
“Distinguished Unit Badge.” Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the requested relief.



THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00887 in Executive Session on 26 Feb 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 22 Feb 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 21 May 14.
	Exhibit D.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 7 Jul 14.
	Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 14.

						





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03890

    Original file (BC 2011 03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the BSM w/1OLC, PH w/3OLCs, CIB, PUC w/2OLCs, PRPUC, APCM and Gold Star Lapel Ribbon On 5 Dec 13, the PH Review Board reviewed and approved the applicant’s request that his uncle be awarded the PH. While we have no documentary evidence that confirms, with any certainty, what period the former member was assigned to the 3rd...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03790

    Original file (BC-2012-03790.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The deceased former service member is entitled to the Army Distinguished Unit Badge and the Navy/Marine Distinguished Unit Badge because he was assigned to the 11th Bombardment Group during World War II during the qualifying period for these awards. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02530

    Original file (BC-2012-02530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02530 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His late uncle’s records be corrected show that he was posthumously awarded two Bronze Star Medals (BSMs), and was entitled to the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), three Presidential Unit Citations (PUCs), formerly known as Distinguished Unit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03658

    Original file (BC-2012-03658.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03658 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Unit Citation (DUC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01274

    Original file (BC 2014 01274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant contends that because he was assigned to the 93rd Bomb Group, and said unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), his records should be corrected to reflect...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC 2002 01403

    Original file (BC 2002 01403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01403 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His award of the Silver Star (SS) be upgraded to the Medal of Honor (MoH) for his actions on 26 Nov 43. According to documentation provided by the applicant, on 11 Jan 44, he was wounded in action. A review of the applicant’s records revealed that he should have been awarded the Prisoner of War Medal (PWM),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01321

    Original file (BC 2014 01321.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While the applicant has provided a detailed account of how the injury occurred, he has not provided an eyewitness statement or medical documentation substantiating the injury was received and treated. In order to present a request to the PH Review Board, a detailed personal account of the circumstances surrounding the injury, medical documentation to substantiate medical treatment was received and if possible, an eyewitness account from an individual who saw the applicant injured. THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05582

    Original file (BC 2013 05582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: According to the decedent’s WD AGO Form 53-98, Certificate of Service, Item 30, Wounds Received in Action, he was wounded on 12 Nov 43 in New Guinea. He was never awarded the PH and his survivors would like to have his records corrected to reflect award of the PH. The decedent pursued award of the PH per his request dated 8 Sep 44; however, a memorandum from the Adjutant General dated 17 Feb 45, states the investigation in the case of the request for award of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01991

    Original file (BC 2013 01991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    NPRC records do not show he was awarded the Aerial Gunner Badge or the Aircrew Member Badge. However, he was awarded both since he completed training and served in a unit that completed combat missions. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. USAF/A3O-AIF recommends approval of the request for the Aircrew Member Badge.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01738

    Original file (BC-2005-01738.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01738 INDEX CODE: 107.00 (Member/Uncle) COUNSEL: None (Applicant/Nephew) 063-14-5768 HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 NOV 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncle be awarded the Silver Star (SS) [or some other fitting award - See Exhibit E] for heroic actions performed in World War II...